1. Academic Validation
  2. The cholinesterase inhibitor, phenserine, improves Morris water maze performance of scopolamine-treated rats

The cholinesterase inhibitor, phenserine, improves Morris water maze performance of scopolamine-treated rats

  • Life Sci. 2005 Jan 21;76(10):1073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.06.028.
Anne M Janas 1 Steven C Cunningham Kara B Duffy Bryan D Devan Nigel H Greig Harold W Holloway Quian-Sheng Yu Alicja L Markowska Donald K Ingram Edward L Spangler
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Laboratory of Experimental Gerontology, NIA/NIH, Gerontology Research Center, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Abstract

Male Fischer-344 rats (n = 38) at 5 months old were tested in a Morris water maze to determine if treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor, phenserine (PHEN), would overcome a learning impairment induced by scopolamine (SCOP), a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist. Each rat was randomly assigned to one of five groups to receive two intraperitoneal injections 60 and 30 min, prior to testing, respectively, as follows: (1) saline-saline (SAL); (2) saline-1.0 mg/kg (SCOP); (3) 2 mg/kg PHEN- SCOP (PHEN2); (4) 4 mg/kg PHEN-SCOP (PHEN4); and (5) 1 mg/kg PHEN-SAL (PHEN1). Maze testing occurred across 5 days with 4 days of acquisition trials (4 trials per day) and a fifth day consisting of a single 120 sec probe trial. PHEN1 and SAL were combined into one control (CON) group for purposes of statistical analysis for both acquisition and probe trials as comparison of the two groups revealed that they did not significantly differ on any measure. SCOP-treated rats were significantly impaired compared to CON in learning the location of the submerged platform as measured by latency to locate the platform and the distance traversed to find the platform across days of testing. The PHEN4 group had significantly lower latencies and traveled a shorter distance to reach the submerged platform when compared to SCOP on the fourth day of trials while the PHEN2 group traveled more directly to the submerged platform but did not have shorter latencies than the SCOP group. For probe trials, CON rats swam closer to the target area (a measure of proximity to the removed platform) than did all other groups, and the PHEN4 group swam in an area more proximate to the target area than did the SCOP-treated group. These findings demonstrate the ability of this drug to improve learning when cholinergic function has been impaired in a spatial memory task.

Figures
Products