1. Academic Validation
  2. The Antinociceptive Agent SBFI-26 Binds to Anandamide Transporters FABP5 and FABP7 at Two Different Sites

The Antinociceptive Agent SBFI-26 Binds to Anandamide Transporters FABP5 and FABP7 at Two Different Sites

  • Biochemistry. 2017 Jul 11;56(27):3454-3462. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00194.
Hao-Chi Hsu 1 Simon Tong 2 Yuchen Zhou 3 Matthew W Elmes 4 Su Yan 2 Martin Kaczocha 4 5 Dale G Deutsch 4 6 Robert C Rizzo 3 6 7 Iwao Ojima 2 6 Huilin Li 1 6
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Cryo-EM Structural Biology Laboratory, Van Andel Research Institute , Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States.
  • 2 Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
  • 3 Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
  • 4 Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
  • 5 Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
  • 6 Institute of Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
  • 7 Laufer Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Stony Brook University , Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
Abstract

Human FABP5 and FABP7 are intracellular endocannabinoid transporters. SBFI-26 is an α-truxillic acid 1-naphthyl monoester that competitively inhibits the activities of FABP5 and FABP7 and produces antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in mice. The synthesis of SBFI-26 yields several stereoisomers, and it is not known how the inhibitor binds the transporters. Here we report co-crystal structures of SBFI-26 in complex with human FABP5 and FABP7 at 2.2 and 1.9 Å resolution, respectively. We found that only (S)-SBFI-26 was present in the crystal structures. The inhibitor largely mimics the fatty acid binding pattern, but it also has several unique interactions. Notably, the FABP7 complex corroborates key aspects of the ligand binding pose at the canonical site previously predicted by virtual screening. In FABP5, SBFI-26 was unexpectedly found to bind at the substrate entry portal region in addition to binding at the canonical ligand-binding pocket. Our structural and binding energy analyses indicate that both R and S forms appear to bind the transporter equally well. We suggest that the S enantiomer observed in the crystal structures may be a result of the crystallization process selectively incorporating the (S)-SBFI-26-FABP complexes into the growing lattice, or that the S enantiomer may bind to the portal site more rapidly than to the canonical site, leading to an increased local concentration of the S enantiomer for binding to the canonical site. Our work reveals two binding poses of SBFI-26 in its target transporters. This knowledge will guide the development of more potent FABP inhibitors based upon the SBFI-26 scaffold.

Figures
Products