1. Academic Validation
  2. Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells

Gemcitabine sensitization by checkpoint kinase 1 inhibition correlates with inhibition of a Rad51 DNA damage response in pancreatic cancer cells

  • Mol Cancer Ther. 2009 Jan;8(1):45-54. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0662.
Leslie A Parsels 1 Meredith A Morgan Daria M Tanska Joshua D Parsels Brian D Palmer R John Booth William A Denny Christine E Canman Alan J Kraker Theodore S Lawrence Jonathan Maybaum
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Upjohn Center for Clinical Pharmacology, 4742E Medical Science II, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5633, USA.
Abstract

The protein kinase checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) has been implicated as a key regulator of cell cycle progression and DNA repair, and inhibitors of Chk1 (e.g., UCN-01 and EXEL-9844) potentiate the cytotoxic actions of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumor cells. We have examined the ability of PD-321852, a small-molecule Chk1 Inhibitor, to potentiate gemcitabine-induced clonogenic death in a panel of pancreatic Cancer cell lines and evaluated the relationship between endpoints associated with Chk1 inhibition and chemosensitization. Gemcitabine chemosensitization by minimally toxic concentrations of PD-321852 ranged from minimal (<3-fold change in survival) in Panc1 cells to >30-fold in MiaPaCa2 cells. PD-321852 inhibited Chk1 in all cell lines as evidenced by stabilization of Cdc25A; in combination with gemcitabine, a synergistic loss of Chk1 protein was observed in the more sensitized cell lines. Gemcitabine chemosensitization, however, did not correlate with abrogation of the S-M or G2-M checkpoint; PD-321852 did not induce premature mitotic entry in gemcitabine-treated BxPC3 or M-Panc96 cells, which were sensitized to gemcitabine 6.2- and 4.6-fold, respectively. In the more sensitized cells lines, PD-321852 not only inhibited gemcitabine-induced RAD51 focus formation and the recovery from gemcitabine-induced replication stress, as evidenced by persistence of gamma-H2AX, but also depleted these cells of RAD51 protein. Our data suggest the inhibition of this Chk1-mediated RAD51 response to gemcitabine-induced replication stress is an important factor in determining gemcitabine chemosensitization by Chk1 inhibition in pancreatic Cancer cells.

Figures
Products