1. Academic Validation
  2. Rapid confirmatory method for the determination of 11 nitroimidazoles in egg using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

Rapid confirmatory method for the determination of 11 nitroimidazoles in egg using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

  • J Chromatogr A. 2009 Nov 13;1216(46):8101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.04.074.
Mark Cronly 1 Patrice Behan Barry Foley Edward Malone Liam Regan
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 School of Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Abstract

A rapid confirmatory method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous identification, confirmation and quantitation of 11 nitroimidazoles in eggs by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The method is validated in accordance with Commission Decision 2002/657/EC and is capable of analysing metronidazole (MNZ), dimetridazole (DMZ), ronidazole (RNZ), ipronidazole (IPZ) and their hydroxy metabolites MNZ-OH, HMMNI (hydroxymethyl, methyl nitroimidazole), IPZ-OH. The method is also capable of analysing carnidazole (CRZ), ornidazole (ORZ), tinidazole (TNZ) and ternidazole (TRZ). MNZ, DMZ and RNZ have been assigned a recommended level (RL) of 3 microg kg(-1) by the Community Reference Laboratory (CRL) in Berlin. The developed method described in this study is easily able to detect all the nitroimidazole compounds investigated at this level and below. Egg samples are extracted with acetonitrile, and NaCl is added to help remove matrix contaminants. The acetonitrile extract undergoes a liquid-liquid wash step with hexane; it is then evaporated and reconstituted in mobile phase. The reconstituted samples are analysed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The decision limits (CCalpha) range from 0.33 to 1.26 microg kg(-1) and the detection capabilities (CCbeta), range from 0.56 to 2.15 microg kg(-1). The results of the in ter-assay study, which was performed by fortifying hen egg samples (n=18) on three separate days, show the accuracy calculated for the various analytes to range between 87.2 and 106.2%. The precision of the method, expressed as %CV values for the inter-assay variation of each analyte at the three levels of fortification (3, 4.5 and 6.0 microg kg(-1)), ranged between 3.7 and 11.3%. A Day 4 analysis was carried out to examine species variances in eggs from different birds such as duck and quail and investigating differences in various battery and free range hen eggs.

Figures
Products