1. Academic Validation
  2. Comparation of time-course, dose-effect, influencing factors and adverse events of biologics in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

Comparation of time-course, dose-effect, influencing factors and adverse events of biologics in the treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis

  • Front Immunol. 2023 May 25:14:1151977. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1151977.
Weiqi Gao 1 2 3 Boran Yu 4 Ya Yan 5 Libo Zhao 1 6 7 Rongsheng Zhao 1 6 7
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • 2 Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • 3 Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • 4 Department of pharmacy, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
  • 5 School of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
  • 6 Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
  • 7 Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Center, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Abstract

Introduction: Biologics is used for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (MSPP), which represent one of the foremost therapeutic advancements in disease of dermatology. Up to now, the relative efficacy and safety across approved andinvestigational biologics for MSPP is still unclear.

Methods: This study aimed to comparative effectiveness of various biological treatments for MSPP measured by PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 (The ratio of patients whose Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) decreased by ≥ 75%, 90% and 100% compared with baseline, respectively). In addition, random models were used together with a Bayesian method to compare direct and indirect Adverse Events (AEs) of biologics with placebo, to make probabilistic statements and predictions on their AEs. The analytic data set was made up of summarized data from 54 trials, including 27,808 patients, with treatment of 17 biologics. Three mathematic models with nonparametric placebo evaluations were established to characterize the longitudinal direction profile for the three efficacy measures as above mentioned.

Results: Our results showed significant differences among treatments. Bimekizumab, sonelokimab, and ixekizumab were found to be the most effective treatments among the biologics. The effects of covariate were further evaluated, patients' age, body weight, duration of disease and percentage of patients previously treated with a biological therapy showed impact on the efficacy. In addition, we found that ixekizumab and risankizumab displayed relatively stable as for efficacy and safety.

Discussion: Our findings provide valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness and safety of biologics for MSPP treatment. These results may aid in clinical decision-making and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Keywords

adverse events comparation; biologics; model-based meta-analysis; moderate to severe psoriasis; relative efficacy.

Figures
Products