1. Academic Validation
  2. Sulforaphane impedes mitochondrial reprogramming and histone acetylation in polarizing M1 (LPS) macrophages

Sulforaphane impedes mitochondrial reprogramming and histone acetylation in polarizing M1 (LPS) macrophages

  • Free Radic Biol Med. 2024 Mar:213:443-456. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.01.029.
Sheyda Bahiraii 1 Martin Brenner 2 Wolfram Weckwerth 3 Elke H Heiss 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; ViennaDoctoral School of Pharmaceutical, Nutritional and Sport Sciences (VDS PhaNuSpo), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; ViennaDoctoral School of Pharmaceutical, Nutritional and Sport Sciences (VDS PhaNuSpo), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Vienna Metabolomics Center (VIME), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • 3 Vienna Metabolomics Center (VIME), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Molecular Systems Biology (MOSYS), Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology (FEE), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: elke.heiss@univie.ac.at.
Abstract

M1 (LPS) macrophages are characterized by a high expression of pro-inflammatory mediators, and distinct metabolic features that comprise increased glycolysis, a broken TCA cycle, or impaired OXPHOS with augmented mitochondrial ROS production. This study investigated whether the phytochemical sulforaphane (Sfn) influences mitochondrial reprogramming during M1 polarization, as well as to what extent this can contribute to Sfn-mediated inhibition of M1 marker expression in murine macrophages. The use of extracellular flux-, metabolite-, and immunoblot analyses as well as fluorescent dyes indicative for mitochondrial morphology, membrane potential or superoxide production, demonstrated that M1 (LPS/Sfn) macrophages maintain an unbroken TCA cycle, higher OXPHOS rate, boosted fusion dynamics, lower membrane potential, and less superoxide production in their mitochondria when compared to control M1 (LPS) cells. Sustained OXPHOS and TCA activity but not the concomitantly observed high dependency on fatty acids as fuel appeared necessary for M1 (LPS/Sfn) macrophages to reduce expression of nos2, il1β, il6 and tnfα. M1 (LPS/Sfn) macrophages also displayed lower nucleo/cytosolic acetyl-CoA levels in association with lower global and site-specific histone acetylation at selected pro-inflammatory gene promoters than M1 (LPS), evident in colorimetric coupled Enzyme assays, immunoblot and ChIP-qPCR analyses, respectively. Supplementation with acetate or citrate was able to rescue both histone acetylation and mRNA expression of the investigated M1 marker genes in Sfn-treated cells. Overall, Sfn preserves mitochondrial functionality and restricts indispensable nuclear acetyl-CoA for histone acetylation and M1 marker expression in LPS-stimulated macrophages.

Keywords

Fatty acid synthesis; Histone acetylation; Immunometabolism; M1 macrophages; Mitochondria; Sulforaphane.

Figures
Products