1. Academic Validation
  2. ER-α36 mediates cisplatin resistance in breast cancer cells through EGFR/HER-2/ERK signaling pathway

ER-α36 mediates cisplatin resistance in breast cancer cells through EGFR/HER-2/ERK signaling pathway

  • J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jun 25;37(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0798-z.
Linlin Zhu 1 Jiao Zou 1 Yuanyin Zhao 1 Xiaomei Jiang 1 Yang Wang 2 Xiangwei Wang 3 Bin Chen 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • 2 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
  • 3 Department of Urology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518060, Guangdong, China.
  • 4 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. binnchen@tom.com.
Abstract

Background: ER-α36, a novel ER-α66 variant, has been demonstrated to promote tamoxifen resistance in breast Cancer cells. However, the role and mechanisms of ER-α36 in cisplatin resistance of breast Cancer cells remain unclear. This study investigates the expression and role of ER-α36 in cisplatin resistance of breast Cancer cells and elucidates its underlying mechanisms.

Methods: The expression of ER-α36 and the proteins involved in nongenomic estrogen signaling was evaluated by western blot analysis. Cisplatin sensitivity was explored by CCK-8 assay, monolayer colony formation assay and Apoptosis assays, respectively. ER-α36 siRNAs/shRNAs and overexpression vector were transfected into cells to down-regulate or up-regulate ER-α36 expression. Loss-and gain-of function assays were performed to investigate the role of ER-α36 in cisplatin sensitivity. The interaction between ER-α36 and EGFR/HER-2 were detected using CoIP. A mouse xenograft model of breast Cancer was established to verify the role of ER-α36 in vivo.

Results: ER-α36 is expressed at higher levels in cisplatin-resistant breast Cancer cells compared to cisplatin sensitive cells. Cisplatin induced up-regulation of ER-α36 in a dose-dependent manner in breast Cancer cells. Overexpression of ER-α36 leaded to cell resistant to cisplatin and knockdown of ER-α36 in cisplatin-resistant breast Cancer cells restored cisplatin sensitivity. The up-regulation of ER-α36 resulted in increased activation of nongenomic estrogen signaling, which was responsible for cisplatin resistance. Disruption of ER-α36-mediated nongenomic estrogen signaling with kinase inhibitors significantly inhibited cisplatin-induced expression of ER-α36 and increased cisplatin sensitivity. The in vivo experiment also confirmed that up-regulation of ER-α36 attenuated cisplatin sensitivity in a mouse xenograft model of breast Cancer.

Conclusions: The results for the first time demonstrated that ER-α36 mediates cisplatin resistance in breast Cancer cells through nongenomic estrogen signaling, suggesting that ER-α36 may serve as a novel target for cisplatin resistance and a potential indicator of cisplatin sensitivity in breast Cancer treatment.

Keywords

Breast cancer; Cisplatin resistance; EGFR; ER-α36; HER-2.

Figures
Products