1. Academic Validation
  2. Contradictory effects of chemical filters in UV/ROS-stressed human keratinocyte and fibroblast cells

Contradictory effects of chemical filters in UV/ROS-stressed human keratinocyte and fibroblast cells

  • ALTEX. 2019;36(2):231-244. doi: 10.14573/altex.1808201.
Stefanie Hofer 1 2 Marlies Stonig 1 Verena Wally 3 Anja Hartmann 2 Dietmar Fuchs 4 Martin Hermann 5 Martin Paparella 1 Markus Ganzera 2 Johanna M Gostner 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Division of Medical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
  • 2 Institute of Pharmacy/Pharmacognosy, University of Innsbruck, Austria.
  • 3 EB House Austria, Research Program for Molecular Therapy of Genodermatoses, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria.
  • 4 Division of Biological Chemistry, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
  • 5 Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract

Chemical UV-filters are frequently applied as active ingredients in Sunscreen to protect from detrimental effects of UV radiation. Regardless, many of these compounds are not well characterized concerning their capacity to counteract UV induced Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS). Intracellular ROS release is an early event upon UV exposure and a crucial trigger of reaction cascades that may provoke adverse effects both in short- and long-term. We report a strategy to assess the capacity of UV-filters (ecamsule, oxybenzone and menthyl anthranilate) to counteract UVA/UVB stress in the human keratinocyte HaCaT and the wildtype Fibs E6/E7 fibroblast cell lines. The reduction of ROS levels was taken as primary endpoint. The effect of treatment on the cells' metabolic activity was analyzed as an indicator of viability post-treatment, to investigate potential immediate and late (photo)toxicity. Additionally, the compounds' antioxidative capacity was investigated using an azo-based radical generator. Established Antioxidants, quercetin and N-acetylcysteine, were used as controls. Data showed remarkable differences in the mode of action of the chemical UV-filters, ranging from protective to pro-oxidative properties, indicating the need for more detailed mode of action-based investigations. Certainly, additional consideration and evaluation will be necessary to further extrapolate these in vitro data for the assessment of in vivo exposure situations. However, the presented approach enables parallel investigations of photoprotective and phototoxic effects of UV-filters, and thus can complement and extent existing in vitro testing strategies.

Keywords

sunscreen; chemical UV-filter; oxidative stress; keratinocyte; fibroblast.

Figures
Products