1. Academic Validation
  2. Effect of intravenous and intraperivenous injections of sclerosants (sodium tetradecyl sulfate and hydroxy polyethoxy dodecan) on the rat femoral vein

Effect of intravenous and intraperivenous injections of sclerosants (sodium tetradecyl sulfate and hydroxy polyethoxy dodecan) on the rat femoral vein

  • Res Exp Med (Berl). 1987;187(6):439-49. doi: 10.1007/BF01852182.
E Morsiani 1 A P Rimondi P Gorini L Fogli L Cappellari S Gullini
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Istituto di Patologia Chirurgica dell'Università di Ferrara, Italy.
Abstract

The sclerosant effect of injected tetradecyl sulfate of sodium (STS) and hydroxy polyethoxy dodecan (HPD) was studied in the rat femoral vein. Intravenous (i.v.) and intravenous plus perivenous (i.v. + p.v.) injections of both sclerosants and physiologic saline were compared as to vein lumen occlusion, fibrosis, phlogosis, and damage to the artery and surrounding nervous and muscular tissues. The study was carried out in 30 rats treated by STS, in 30 treated by HPD, and 15 Animals were injected with saline. The neurovascular bundle and adjacent muscle were removed at 48 h, 7 and 30 days and examined histologically. I.v. injections of STS produced a solid occlusion of the vein in a significant number of cases, after 30 days (P less than 0.01). A statistically significant number of solid occlusions of the femoral vein resulted after i.v. + p.v. injection of STS and HPD, at 48 h, 7 and 30 days (P less than 0.05; P less than 0.01). There was no significant difference between STS and HPD after i.v. + p.v. injection. After i.v. + p.v. we recorded a marked inflammation of muscle with signs of focal necrosis, at 48 h and 7 days. Our study indicated that i.v. + p.v. injection of STS and HPD provided a high degree of efficacy as regards vein occlusion. On the Other hand, i.v. + p.v. injection induced a severe inflammation and necrosis of the tissues surrounding the sclerosed vein. Extrapolating our results to the endoscopic sclerotherapy for esophageal variceal bleeding, we conclude that paravariceal injection of sclerosants is a dangerous procedure, even though efficacious to reduce variceal hemorrhage, owing to the high risk of iatrogenic ulcers and esophageal perforation caused by muscular and mucosal necrosis.

Figures
Products