1. Academic Validation
  2. Discovery of novel thiazole derivatives containing pyrazole scaffold as PPAR-γ Agonists, α-Glucosidase, α-Amylase and COX-2 inhibitors; Design, synthesis and in silico study

Discovery of novel thiazole derivatives containing pyrazole scaffold as PPAR-γ Agonists, α-Glucosidase, α-Amylase and COX-2 inhibitors; Design, synthesis and in silico study

  • Bioorg Chem. 2024 Nov:152:107760. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.107760.
Wael A A Fadaly 1 Ahmed Elshewy 2 Mohamed T M Nemr 3 Kareem Abdou 4 Ahmed M Sayed 5 Nesma M Kahk 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt.
  • 2 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Eini street 11562, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, The American University of Iraq-Baghdad (AUIB), Baghdad, Iraq.
  • 3 Pharmaceutical Organic Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Kasr El-Eini street 11562, Cairo, Egypt. Electronic address: Mohamed.nemr@pharma.cu.edu.eg.
  • 4 Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo 11562, Egypt.
  • 5 Department of Pharmacognosy, Collage of Pharmacy, Almaaqal University, 61014 Basrah, Iraq.
Abstract

A novel series of thiazole derivatives with pyrazole scaffold 16a-l as hybrid rosiglitazone/celecoxib analogs was designed, synthesized and tested for its PPAR-γ activation, α-glucosidase, α-amylase and COX-2 inhibitory activities. Regarding the anti-diabetic activity, all compounds were assessed in vitro against PPAR-γ activation, α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition in addition to in vivo hypoglycemic activity (one day and 15 days studies). Compounds 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k showed good PPAR-γ activation (activation % ≈ 72-79 %) compared to that of the reference drug rosiglitazone (74 %). In addition, the same derivatives 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k showed the highest inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase (IC50 = 0.158, 0.314, 0.305, 0.128 μM, respectively) and against α-amylase (IC50 = 32.46, 23.21, 7.74, 35.85 μM, respectively) compared to the reference drug acarbose (IC50 = 0.161 and 31.46 μM for α-glucosidase and α-amylase, respectively). The most active derivatives 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k also revealed good in vivo hypoglycemic effect comparable to that of rosiglitazone. In addition, compounds 16b and 16c had the best COX-2 selectivity index (S.I. = 18.7, 31.7, respectively) compared to celecoxib (S.I. = 10.3). In vivo anti-inflammatory activity of the target derivatives 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k supported the results of in vitro screening as the derivatives 16b and 16c (ED50 = 8.2 and 24 mg/kg, respectively) were more potent than celecoxib (ED50 = 30 mg/kg). In silico docking, ADME, toxicity, and molecular dynamic studies were carried out to explain the interactions of the most active anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory compounds 16b, 16c, 16e and 16 k with the target Enzymes in addition to their physiochemical parameters.

Keywords

Anti-diabetic; Anti-inflammatory; COX-2 inhibitors; PPAR-γ Agonists; α-Amylase inhibitors; α-Glucosidase.

Figures
Products