1. Academic Validation
  2. In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii

In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii

  • J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Feb 13;dkad032. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad032.
Christian M Gill 1 Debora Santini 1 Miki Takemura 2 Christopher Longshaw 3 Yoshinori Yamano 2 Roger Echols 4 David P Nicolau 1 5
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
  • 2 Research Planning Department, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, 3-1-1, Futaba-cho, Toyonaka,Osaka 561-0825, Japan.
  • 3 Scientific Affairs, Shionogi B.V., 33 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6UF, UK.
  • 4 Infectious Disease Drug Development Consulting, LLC, 753 Westport Road, Easton, CT, USA.
  • 5 Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine Infection model.

Methods: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log10 cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control Animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking.

Results: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA -3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log10 cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced -3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced -2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated Animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy.

Conclusions: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.

Figures
Products