1. Academic Validation
  2. New high affinity peptide antagonists to the spinal galanin receptor

New high affinity peptide antagonists to the spinal galanin receptor

  • Br J Pharmacol. 1995 Oct;116(3):2076-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16414.x.
X J Xu 1 Z Wiesenfeld-Hallin U Langel K Bedecs T Bartfai
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Laboratory Medical Science and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Abstract

1. The role of endogenous Galanin in somatosensory processing has been studied with Galanin receptor antagonists. The new Galanin receptor ligands C7, M32, M38 and M40 bind with high affinity (Kd in nanomolar range) to spinal cord Galanin receptors and possess oxidative stability as compared to earlier generations of peptide ligands. These Peptides have been examined in the spinal flexor reflex model where exogenous Galanin exhibited biphasic excitatory and inhibitory effects. 2. Intrathecal administration of C7 [Galanin(1-13)-spantide] and M32 [Galanin (1-13)-neuropeptide Y(25-36) amide] blocked facilitation of the nociceptive flexor reflex induced by 30 pmol intrathecal Galanin in decerebrate, spinalized rats in a dose-dependent manner, thus behaving as antagonists of the Galanin receptor. In contrast, M38[Galanin(1-13)-(Ala-Leu)3-Ala amide] and M40 [Galanin(1-13)-Pro-Pro-(Ala-Leu)2-Ala amide], exhibited only weak antagonism at high doses in this model. Moreover, lower doses of M40 potentiated galanin-induced reflex facilitation. C7 was neurotoxic at high doses in the rat spinal cord. 3. M32 and C7 were potent antagonists of Galanin receptors in rat spinal cord, in correlation with their in vitro binding characteristics. In contrast, M38 and M40, despite their high in vitro affinity, exhibited only very weak antagonism. Moreover, M40 may also behave as a partial agonist. 4. Previous studies have shown that the Galanin receptor may be heterogeneous. The discrepancy between in vitro binding and in vivo antagonistic potency of M38 and M40 may also suggest the presence of different Galanin receptor subtypes within the rat spinal cord. However, other explanations for the discrepancy, such as differences in metabolic stability, diffusion rates and penetration to the site of action are also possible.

Figures
Products